On April 27, the Federal Communications Commission will vote on whether
to require broadcast TV stations to post data online about who bought political
spots they broadcast. Stations already collect the data and must make it publicly available, but they have
resisted putting it online. Meantime, projects like ProPublica’s “Free the
Files” are posting some data with volunteer help.
How might the FCC decision go?
The commission has five members, but two of the seats are vacant
because President Obama’s nominees are stalled in the
Senate. The three
sitting commissioners declined to answer questions about the new
disclosure rule, but their public statements suggest it may pass. Here’s a rundown:
Julius Genachowski, Chairman
Democrat
Appointed: 2009
Likely Yes
In this Internet age, of course the public information in the “public file” kept by
broadcasters should be online, not in filing cabinets.
At an event in Phoenix in October, 2011
We’re applying the common sense principles of moving information online to rules relating to television broadcasters… another important step in the Commission’s efforts to ensure effective public access to information.
Comments on the original proposal, October, 2011
Robert McDowell
Republican
Appointed: 2006, reappointed 2009
Unlike other parts of the public inspection file, the contents of the
political file do not speak to whether a broadcaster is serving its local community of
license. The political file is a tool for examining transparency in campaign spending
rather than broadcaster behavior…Congress should be aware that this
requirement seems to be experiencing “mission creep” at the FCC.
Testimony to Congress, March, 2012
I must ask why the FCC is once again proposing to fix what appears to be a non-
existent problem?… Before taking any further steps, the Commission should pause and think through not only the potential economic effects of its proposals, but the electoral and Constitutional consequences as well. After all, what’s the rush?
Speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference, February, 2012
Are we once again heading down a path towards needlessly burdensome rules, regulatory overreach, Paperwork Reduction Act challenges and unconstitutional intrusions? Stay tuned.
Comments on the initial
proposal, October, 2011
Mignon Clyburn
Democrat
Appointed: 2009
Likely Yes
A community’s desire to examine public files is only possible if they have realistic, meaningful access. I’ve seen such files. They reside deep within the broadcast station’s inner labyrinth, far from the reception area, in a vintage file cabinet with letters marked only in small font. I make light of this, to stress a point. Now is the time to move these ‘PUBLIC’ files out of cabinets and onto the web… Creating a meaningful way for the public to view these files with an online engagement is, to quote a popular commercial, ‘priceless.’
Comments
on the initial proposal, October, 2011
