This map was originally published in May and has been updated. | Related:Why Florida is Sitting on $300 Million Meant to Help Homeowners
As part of the mortgage settlement finalized in April, 2012, the five biggest banks agreed to pay $2.5 billion to 49 states and the District of Columbia. ProPublica contacted every state to determine whether the money will be going to consumer-focused efforts related to the settlement or not. See below for a breakdown of each state's share. | Related:Billion Dollar Bait & Switch: States Divert Foreclosure Deal Funds.
Click on each state for more information.
State | Total $ | Avg Delinquency Rate | Aid to Homeowners | General Fund | To Be Determined | Investigations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Statesz | $2,539,900,000 | .% | $1,039,000,000 | $990,000,000 | $378,600,000 | $144,100,000 |
AlabamaB | $25,300,000 | 5.74% | $1,800,000 | $2,500,000 | $19,000,000 | $2,000,000 |
AlaskaA | $3,300,000 | 2.35% | $0 | $0 | $3,300,000 | $0 |
ArizonaD | $97,800,000 | 9.75% | $47,800,000 | $50,000,000 | $0 | $0 |
ArkansasC | $12,800,000 | 5.12% | $12,000,000 | $800,000 | $0 | $0 |
CaliforniaE | $410,600,000 | 9.41% | $18,400,000 | $306,200,000 | $0 | $86,000,000 |
ColoradoF | $50,200,000 | 4.72% | $50,400,000 | $0 | $0 | $800,000 |
ConnecticutG | $26,100,000 | 7.01% | $23,500,000 | $2,600,000 | $0 | $0 |
DelawareH | $7,900,000 | 6.51% | $7,600,000 | $0 | $300,000 | $2,700,000 |
District of Columbiay | $4,400,000 | 5.82% | $4,400,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
FloridaI | $334,100,000 | 17.88% | $0 | $33,400,000 | $300,700,000 | $0 |
GeorgiaJ | $99,400,000 | 8.00% | $0 | $99,400,000 | $0 | $0 |
HawaiiK | $7,900,000 | 6.86% | $7,900,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
IdahoM | $13,300,000 | 5.60% | $500,000 | $12,800,000 | $0 | $0 |
IllinoisN | $105,800,000 | 9.87% | $105,800,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
IndianaO | $43,800,000 | 8.43% | $43,800,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
IowaL | $14,700,000 | 4.81% | $10,100,000 | $6,000,000 | $0 | $0 |
KansasP | $13,800,000 | 4.73% | $0 | $0 | $13,800,000 | $0 |
KentuckyQ | $19,200,000 | 6.46% | $10,000,000 | $4,200,000 | $0 | $5,000,000 |
LouisianaR | $21,700,000 | 6.85% | $2,000,000 | $0 | $17,700,000 | $2,000,000 |
MaineU | $6,900,000 | 7.73% | $1,500,000 | $5,400,000 | $0 | $0 |
MarylandT | $59,700,000 | 7.93% | $51,600,000 | $6,000,000 | $0 | $2,100,000 |
MassachusettsS | $44,500,000 | 6.83% | $37,500,000 | $4,400,000 | $0 | $2,500,000 |
MichiganV | $97,200,000 | 8.63% | $87,200,000 | $10,000,000 | $0 | $0 |
MinnesotaW | $41,500,000 | 5.40% | $41,500,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
MississippiY | $13,600,000 | 8.03% | $5,800,000 | $7,700,000 | $0 | $0 |
MissouriX | $39,600,000 | 5.19% | $1,000,000 | $38,600,000 | $0 | $0 |
MontanaZ | $4,900,000 | 3.21% | $3,900,000 | $500,000 | $0 | $1,500,000 |
Nebraskac | $8,400,000 | 3.63% | $1,000,000 | $7,400,000 | $0 | $0 |
Nevadag | $57,400,000 | 15.26% | $33,500,000 | $0 | $23,900,000 | $0 |
New Hampshired | $9,600,000 | 5.16% | $6,000,000 | $0 | $0 | $3,500,000 |
New Jerseye | $72,100,000 | 9.87% | $0 | $75,000,000 | $0 | $0 |
New Mexicof | $11,200,000 | 5.48% | $11,200,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
New Yorkh | $107,600,000 | 8.03% | $107,600,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
North Carolinaa | $60,900,000 | 5.58% | $22,800,000 | $23,100,000 | $0 | $14,400,000 |
North Dakotab | $1,900,000 | 2.04% | $1,900,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Ohioi | $92,800,000 | 8.57% | $92,800,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Oklahomaj | $0 | 5.45% | $18,600,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Oregonk | $29,300,000 | 5.38% | $7,700,000 | $17,600,000 | $0 | $4,000,000 |
Pennsylvanial | $66,500,000 | 6.07% | $66,500,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Rhode Islandm | $8,500,000 | 8.04% | $8,500,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
South Carolinan | $31,300,000 | 6.76% | $0 | $30,300,000 | $0 | $3,100,000 |
South Dakotao | $2,900,000 | 2.91% | $2,900,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Tennesseep | $41,200,000 | 6.29% | $35,500,000 | $4,100,000 | $0 | $1,900,000 |
Texasq | $134,600,000 | 5.02% | $0 | $134,600,000 | $0 | $0 |
Utahr | $22,000,000 | 5.70% | $0 | $20,000,000 | $0 | $2,000,000 |
Vermontt | $2,600,000 | 4.56% | $1,100,000 | $2,400,000 | $0 | $0 |
Virginias | $66,500,000 | 4.62% | $7,000,000 | $59,500,000 | $0 | $0 |
Washingtonu | $54,200,000 | 5.58% | $43,800,000 | $5,400,000 | $0 | $5,000,000 |
West Virginiaw | $5,700,000 | 4.96% | $5,700,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Wisconsinv | $30,200,000 | 6.07% | $1,300,000 | $25,800,000 | $0 | $3,100,000 |
Wyomingx | $2,600,000 | 2.75% | $2,600,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Note: Some states' totals may not sum due to rounding. Also, some states provided breakdowns that included funds in addition to the amount sent to the state's attorney general through the settlement. As a result, those states' allocations together exceed their "Total $." Click on each state for details.
Update (June 1): This chart has been updated to show that the exact allocation of New Jersey’s settlement dollars is still to be determined.
Update (May 29): This chart has been updated to show that all of Illinois’ funds will go to homeowner aid programs. A spokeswoman from the attorney general’s office said that although the most of the state’s money had not yet been committed to specific programs, all of the proposals being reviewed were homeowner-focused.
Update (May 24): This chart has been updated to reflect that Virginia allocated $7 million to a fund for housing programs that would not have received funding had it not been for the settlement, according to state lawmakers.
Correction (May 22): An earlier version of this chart overstated the amount that Ohio will put toward consumer-related programs and investigations. In fact, $75 million will go to demolition, and $18 million will go to still unspecified consumer programs.